Stalin's speech to the Politburo on
Its genuineness analyzed by Carl O. Nordling
According to an article in the Swiss
journal Revue de Droit International,
Soviet dictator Stalin would have made a speech on 19 August at
The
gist of the alleged speech is that the Pact was needed precisely because it would
induce Hitler to start a Euoropean war. Such a war was expected to exhaust the
belligerents, thus paving the way for the U.S.S.R. to walk away with the whole
lot, eventually. (See Stalin’s August 1939 speech, complete
version.)
After the speech, the Politburo is said
to have charged Dimitro Manuilsky (1883-1959) and Georgi Dimitrov (1882-1949)
to work out instructions to give to Party leaders abroad. These instructions
should explain the necessity of the Pact, and Stalin undertook to direct the
work himself. Such instructions were actually published on 8 September, only
three weeks after the meeting; see Stalin’s Politburo explains Ribbentrop
pact.
Two versions of the speech are known,
both defective, i.e. the
The authenticity of
the alleged speech has been called in question by e.g. E. Jäckel (in
Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, October 1958, p. 383) and
Otechestvennaya istoriya, 1/2004). The latter titled his article "Stalin’s
speech that was never held.”
There
is, however, much evidence indicating that Stalin held a speech in which he
expressed precisely the ideas that make up the extant versions:
Ever
since 1925 Stalin had argued that an imperialistic war would break out and
weaken capitalism. This war would lead to a proletarian revolution.1
In a
speech to the Central Committee in 1925 Stalin had urged that the U.S.S.R.
should enter the coming war, but enter last.2
The
Finnish Communist leader Arvo Tuominen, who knew Stalin personally, felt
absolutely sure (in 1941) that Stalin could have prevented the World War if he
had wanted to.3
The
Russian Colonel Grigory Tokaev in 1939 heard lectures by Ambassador Troyanovsky
and Major-General Voloshin, both advocating the importance of coercing
The American
consul in
Thre are two different
versions of the speech, which seems to preclude the possibility of an
occasional case of deception by some ill-disposed journalist.
The concise
instructions that were supposed to be a consequence of the speech existed long
before any version of the speech was published.
In his official
“denial” Stalin spoke a lot of peace proposals but did not deny that he had urged
for a lengthy war that would exhaust the belligerents.6
Notes:
1. The essential Stalin. Major
Theoretical Writings 1905-52.
2. Stalin, Iosif V., Sochineniya
VII, 1947, p.14; Garthoff, Raymond L.,
Soviet Military Policy.
3.
Tuominen, Arvo, Neuvostoliitto Leninin
perinnön vartijana. Stockholm 1941, pp. 9-13.
4. Tokaev, G.A., Stalin Means War.
5. Lukes,
6.
Pravda, 30 November 1939, p. 3.